|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Electronic circuit design discusions
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
"Society" k00ks out bigtime
On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society"
<Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: >"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in embarassment
>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
>> Viking wrote:
>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright ><u @example.net> wrote: >>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>>wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
>>>rat) wrote:
>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
>>>>>nonsense.
>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
> *laugh* What?
An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ? How unsurprising. >You're loony tunes.
Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is endemic in soc.men. Evasion of question noted.
>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total inability to produce any correlation let alone causation? Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
>Viking, like most of your bettters, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>laughs because your little rat-buddy are so unreasoning
>and foolish. Plus, your habit of projecting your own
>insecurities onto others (likely, something you do, Brandon
>D. Cartwright, as an ego-defense against the truth of
>what a prick you are) is a further source of amusement
>to your betters. Free Clue: Any hint of embarassment you
>think you detect in Viking's laugh, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>comes from Viking's sympathy for the embarassment that YOU
>are.
>Out of pity for you (something you don't deserve,
>Brandon D. Cartwright but magnanamity is a quality
>your betters have in generous quantity -- you wouldn't
>understand of course), I'll snip out your stupidest sniveling
>and move on...
>>> You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might.
>>> There is a sexual tension between the genders,
>>> and that's a matter of power.
>> Is this incoherent babble [...]
>Sigh.
>Give a rape fantasist like you a break, Brandon D. Tartrapist,
>and you let your imagination get all too florid. Tsk, tsk.
>"Just look around you," as a rather notorious feminist
>once advised, Brandon D. Tartrapist, and you'll see
>plenty of females dressing to attract the attention of men.
>Their _sexual_ attention. Yeah, I realize that feminists
>like you
Since when am I a feminist k00k? FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
> expect men to keep their emotions and sexual
>responses under tighter control than women do -- this
>is one of your many feminist double standards, Brandon
>D. Tartrapist. Face it, when you put on your pretense
>of being morally superior and indulge your feminist twit
>self in a bash-fest of men better than you, Brandon D.
>Tartrapistwannabee, you are being a hypocrite. Again.
"men" who gloat over the rape and mutilation of other men's wives and daughters are nobodies "betters k00k.
>Your betters have seen so many examples of sad punks
>like you, Branded D. Tartrapistwannabee, that few of
>your betters bother trying to inform you of your idiocies
>and bigotries in hopes of reforming you. Rather, most
>of your betters just enjoy exploiting you for the fun of
>making an example of you to others.
>Some females, when questioned about their "choice"
>of dressing in the fashion of streetwalkers and Britney
>Spears wannabees, try out the answer their grandmothers
>would scoff at: "I'm not dressing for men, I'm dressing
>for myself and I just want to look pretty." Sheesh.
>Of course she's "dressing for men"! Where does she
>suppose the standard of "pretty" comes from? Uh huh,
>it's the appearance of youthful female sexual fertility.
>Yes, your betters, Branded A Selfwanker, know that
>the capacity of females to hypnotize themselves into
>being blind to the absurdity of the whoppers that so
>many females swallow is nearly limitless. You, being
>a mere boy and one who still believes that his mommy
>is sooo pure, have much of your mommy's indoctrination
>to discard and a lot of reality to learn about before you
>can earn respect as a man. If you can.
Classic meltdown. Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
news:3a7843tm68au7grsa84b0ekek5jrru8o1j@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > <Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: >>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in
>>embarassment
>>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
>>> Viking wrote:
>>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
>>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
>>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
>>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
>>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
>>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
> Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> wrote:
>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>><u@example.net> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
>>>>rat) wrote:
>>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
>>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
>>>>>>nonsense.
>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
>>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
>> *laugh* What?
> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> How unsurprising.
>>You're loony tunes.
> Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
> invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
> endemic in soc.men.
> Evasion of question noted.
>>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
>>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
> Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
> inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
> Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
> Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
>>Viking, like most of your bettters, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>laughs because your little rat-buddy are so unreasoning
>>and foolish. Plus, your habit of projecting your own
>>insecurities onto others (likely, something you do, Brandon
>>D. Cartwright, as an ego-defense against the truth of
>>what a prick you are) is a further source of amusement
>>to your betters. Free Clue: Any hint of embarassment you
>>think you detect in Viking's laugh, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>comes from Viking's sympathy for the embarassment that YOU
>>are.
>>Out of pity for you (something you don't deserve,
>>Brandon D. Cartwright but magnanamity is a quality
>>your betters have in generous quantity -- you wouldn't
>>understand of course), I'll snip out your stupidest sniveling
>>and move on...
>>>> You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might.
>>>> There is a sexual tension between the genders,
>>>> and that's a matter of power.
>>> Is this incoherent babble [...]
>>Sigh.
>>Give a rape fantasist like you a break, Brandon D. Tartrapist,
>>and you let your imagination get all too florid. Tsk, tsk.
>>"Just look around you," as a rather notorious feminist
>>once advised, Brandon D. Tartrapist, and you'll see
>>plenty of females dressing to attract the attention of men.
>>Their _sexual_ attention. Yeah, I realize that feminists
>>like you
> Since when am I a feminist k00k?
> FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
>> expect men to keep their emotions and sexual
>>responses under tighter control than women do -- this
>>is one of your many feminist double standards, Brandon
>>D. Tartrapist. Face it, when you put on your pretense
>>of being morally superior and indulge your feminist twit
>>self in a bash-fest of men better than you, Brandon D.
>>Tartrapistwannabee, you are being a hypocrite. Again.
> "men" who gloat over the rape and mutilation of other men's
> wives and daughters are nobodies "betters k00k.
>>Your betters have seen so many examples of sad punks
>>like you, Branded D. Tartrapistwannabee, that few of
>>your betters bother trying to inform you of your idiocies
>>and bigotries in hopes of reforming you. Rather, most
>>of your betters just enjoy exploiting you for the fun of
>>making an example of you to others.
>>Some females, when questioned about their "choice"
>>of dressing in the fashion of streetwalkers and Britney
>>Spears wannabees, try out the answer their grandmothers
>>would scoff at: "I'm not dressing for men, I'm dressing
>>for myself and I just want to look pretty." Sheesh.
>>Of course she's "dressing for men"! Where does she
>>suppose the standard of "pretty" comes from? Uh huh,
>>it's the appearance of youthful female sexual fertility.
>>Yes, your betters, Branded A Selfwanker, know that
>>the capacity of females to hypnotize themselves into
>>being blind to the absurdity of the whoppers that so
>>many females swallow is nearly limitless. You, being
>>a mere boy and one who still believes that his mommy
>>is sooo pure, have much of your mommy's indoctrination
>>to discard and a lot of reality to learn about before you
>>can earn respect as a man. If you can.
> Classic meltdown.
> Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
God only knows but I wish they would keep their gutwrenching sordid filth out of sci.electronics.design. To be honest I consider you a troll Brandon, but in comparison you are a
saint.
The sheer depravity and horror of these soc.men deviants goes way beyond any
bounds of human decency.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
news:3a7843tm68au7grsa84b0ekek5jrru8o1j@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > <Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: >>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in
>>embarassment
>>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
>>> Viking wrote:
>>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
>>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
>>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
>>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
>>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
>>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
> Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> wrote:
>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>><u@example.net> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
>>>>rat) wrote:
>>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
>>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
>>>>>>nonsense.
>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
>>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
>> *laugh* What?
> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> How unsurprising.
>>You're loony tunes.
> Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
> invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
> endemic in soc.men.
> Evasion of question noted.
>>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
>>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
> Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
> inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
> Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
> Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
>>Viking, like most of your bettters, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>laughs because your little rat-buddy are so unreasoning
>>and foolish. Plus, your habit of projecting your own
>>insecurities onto others (likely, something you do, Brandon
>>D. Cartwright, as an ego-defense against the truth of
>>what a prick you are) is a further source of amusement
>>to your betters. Free Clue: Any hint of embarassment you
>>think you detect in Viking's laugh, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>comes from Viking's sympathy for the embarassment that YOU
>>are.
>>Out of pity for you (something you don't deserve,
>>Brandon D. Cartwright but magnanamity is a quality
>>your betters have in generous quantity -- you wouldn't
>>understand of course), I'll snip out your stupidest sniveling
>>and move on...
>>>> You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might.
>>>> There is a sexual tension between the genders,
>>>> and that's a matter of power.
>>> Is this incoherent babble [...]
>>Sigh.
>>Give a rape fantasist like you a break, Brandon D. Tartrapist,
>>and you let your imagination get all too florid. Tsk, tsk.
>>"Just look around you," as a rather notorious feminist
>>once advised, Brandon D. Tartrapist, and you'll see
>>plenty of females dressing to attract the attention of men.
>>Their _sexual_ attention. Yeah, I realize that feminists
>>like you
> Since when am I a feminist k00k?
> FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
>> expect men to keep their emotions and sexual
>>responses under tighter control than women do -- this
>>is one of your many feminist double standards, Brandon
>>D. Tartrapist. Face it, when you put on your pretense
>>of being morally superior and indulge your feminist twit
>>self in a bash-fest of men better than you, Brandon D.
>>Tartrapistwannabee, you are being a hypocrite. Again.
> "men" who gloat over the rape and mutilation of other men's
> wives and daughters are nobodies "betters k00k.
>>Your betters have seen so many examples of sad punks
>>like you, Branded D. Tartrapistwannabee, that few of
>>your betters bother trying to inform you of your idiocies
>>and bigotries in hopes of reforming you. Rather, most
>>of your betters just enjoy exploiting you for the fun of
>>making an example of you to others.
>>Some females, when questioned about their "choice"
>>of dressing in the fashion of streetwalkers and Britney
>>Spears wannabees, try out the answer their grandmothers
>>would scoff at: "I'm not dressing for men, I'm dressing
>>for myself and I just want to look pretty." Sheesh.
>>Of course she's "dressing for men"! Where does she
>>suppose the standard of "pretty" comes from? Uh huh,
>>it's the appearance of youthful female sexual fertility.
>>Yes, your betters, Branded A Selfwanker, know that
>>the capacity of females to hypnotize themselves into
>>being blind to the absurdity of the whoppers that so
>>many females swallow is nearly limitless. You, being
>>a mere boy and one who still believes that his mommy
>>is sooo pure, have much of your mommy's indoctrination
>>to discard and a lot of reality to learn about before you
>>can earn respect as a man. If you can.
> Classic meltdown.
> Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
Well! if you leave that will be one less. :-)
On May 11, 5:38 pm, Brandon D Cartwright <u @example.net> wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
Fucking preay I don't start posting to sci.elec.design cock suckers groups, boi. > Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
"We are just average guys, normal blokes... who like a bit of torture.:" Chopper (2000)
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
In article <1178869964.863275.212 @e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, "conno @hotmail.com" <conno @hotmail.com> wrote: > On May 11, 5:38 pm, Brandon D Cartwright <u @example.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > > FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> > demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
> Fucking preay I don't start posting to sci.elec.design cock suckers
> groups, boi.
> > Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
its an experiment like how many rats can you stuff into a cage before they claw out their own brains meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>> psychiatrist's attention.
>> Seek help before it's too late.
>My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO very
>touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists. It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find them objects of admiration and role models. You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
news:3a7843tm68au7grsa84b0ekek5jrru8o1j@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > <Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: >>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in
>>embarassment
>>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
>>> Viking wrote:
>>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
>>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
>>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
>>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
>>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
>>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
> Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> wrote:
>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>><u@example.net> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
>>>>rat) wrote:
>>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
>>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
>>>>>>nonsense.
>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
>>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
>> *laugh* What?
> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> How unsurprising.
>>You're loony tunes.
> Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
> invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
> endemic in soc.men.
> Evasion of question noted.
>>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
>>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
> Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
> inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
> Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
> Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
Rape is caused by rapists..end of story. You really are a silly little girl. "Victims" frequently do things to bring
on their victimhood. You ever hear of a death wish? Well, many females have
a rape wish which is just a subconscious extension of the desire in the
reptilian part of their brain that controls their compulsion to breed.
Reproduction is more important than life. Even a naive young girl knows that
if she engages in certain conduct, like drinking and going home with a man,
she is liable to get fucked, but yet will still do it even if consciously
she claims she doesn't want to have sex. Yet, she puts herself right into a
situation where she is likely to have sex. She is in effect subconsciously
inviting mating behaviour by her actions much the same as other female
animals exhibit certain behaviours when they want to mate. Mothers used to
warn their daughters about the consrquences of behaving like Hos .I really
think this should be taught to girls in sex ed classes at school. If you
exhibit mating behaviours you are inviting sex and therefore it is not rape
when you get what you invited.
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:27:48 GMT, "Avenger" <aven @avengers.co.uk> wrote:
>"MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:qnV0i.3487$085.2772@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>> news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>> My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO very
>> touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
>There's no such thing as rape, it's merely informal mating.
Try to hang on to that thought when you are finally caught and jailed. It might make some of your encounters more tolerable. -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:30:08 GMT, "Avenger" <aven @avengers.co.uk> wrote:
>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>news:3a7843tm68au7grsa84b0ekek5jrru8o1j@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society"
>> <Soci@feminism.is.invalid> wrote:
>>>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in
>>>embarassment
>>>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
>>>> Viking wrote:
>>>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
>>>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
>>>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
>>>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
>>>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>>>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
>>>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
>>>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
>> Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
>> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
>>><u@example.net> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
>>>>>rat) wrote:
>>>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
>>>>>>>nonsense.
>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
>>>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
>>> *laugh* What?
>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
>> How unsurprising.
>>>You're loony tunes.
>> Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
>> invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
>> endemic in soc.men.
>> Evasion of question noted.
>>>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
>>>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
>> Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
>> inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
>> Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
>> Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
>Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
>You really are a silly little girl. "Victims" frequently do things to bring
>on their victimhood. You ever hear of a death wish? Well, many females have
>a rape wish which is just a subconscious extension of the desire in the
>reptilian part of their brain that controls their compulsion to breed.
>Reproduction is more important than life. Even a naive young girl knows that
>if she engages in certain conduct, like drinking and going home with a man,
>she is liable to get fucked, but yet will still do it even if consciously
>she claims she doesn't want to have sex. Yet, she puts herself right into a
>situation where she is likely to have sex. She is in effect subconsciously
>inviting mating behaviour by her actions much the same as other female
>animals exhibit certain behaviours when they want to mate. Mothers used to
>warn their daughters about the consrquences of behaving like Hos .I really
>think this should be taught to girls in sex ed classes at school. If you
>exhibit mating behaviours you are inviting sex and therefore it is not rape
>when you get what you invited.
You really think the Judge and Jury will buy that? You want to work on it a bit more before your inevitable arrest. Tick Tock -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
"cyclops" <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote in message ...
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> > wrote: >>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>>news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>>My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO very
>>touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists.
> It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find them objects
> of admiration and role models.
> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
Ha Ha Ha! you really do let that one cell brain of yours run wild. -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:27:48 GMT, "Avenger" <aven @avengers.co.uk> wrote:
>"MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:qnV0i.3487$085.2772@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> "Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>> news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>> My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO very
>> touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
>There's no such thing as rape, it's merely informal mating.
Clearly there is no doubt that the answer to the question in the subject line is a resounding YES! -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
Avenger <aven @avengers.co.uk> Thou unsightly parlous boy. Thou cockered quintessence of dust. Ye buzzed: > You really are a silly little girl. "Victims" frequently do things to
> bring on their victimhood. You ever hear of a death wish? Well, many
> females have a rape wish which is just a subconscious extension of
> the desire in the reptilian part of their brain that controls their
> compulsion to breed. Reproduction is more important than life. Even a
> naive young girl knows that if she engages in certain conduct, like
> drinking
^^^^^^^^^^ > and going home with a man, she is liable to get fucked, but
> yet will still do it even if consciously she claims she doesn't want
> to have sex. Yet, she puts herself right into a situation where she
> is likely to have sex. She is in effect subconsciously inviting
> mating behaviour by her actions much the same as other female animals
> exhibit certain behaviours when they want to mate. Mothers used to
> warn their daughters about the consrquences of behaving like Hos .I
> really think this should be taught to girls in sex ed classes at
> school. If you exhibit mating behaviours you are inviting sex and
> therefore it is not rape when you get what you invited.
Since when has drinking been a mating behaviour, fuckchop? --
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Jebo ti poshtar mrtvu mamu u podrumu u kojem je izgorila baka dok ti je
pokushavala zapaliti sestru.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:42:47 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>"cyclops" <cycl@nopspam.org> wrote in message
>news:f2a843th467sjbv87lo2499t0sgq6n7v02@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>>>news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>>>My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO very
>>>touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
>> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists.
>> It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find them objects
>> of admiration and role models.
>> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
>Ha Ha Ha! you really do let that one cell brain of yours run wild.
Think you have worked out all the angles and are too clever to be caught eh? -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
MCP <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> Thou troyan. Thou are rough and hairy. Ye squalled:
> "cyclops" <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote in message > news:f2a843th467sjbv87lo2499t0sgq6n7v02@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> "Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>>> news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>>>> Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>> Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as
>>>>> it places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it
>>>>> causes such conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>> Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>> directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>> thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic
>>>>> dynamic structures within the current confines of the masculine
>>>>> sex role in the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>> Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>>> My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are
>>> SO very touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why
>>> that is?
>> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate
>> rapists. It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find
>> them objects of admiration and role models.
>> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
> Ha Ha Ha! you really do let that one cell brain of yours run wild.
And why shouldn't she? You let your zero functioning cell brain run riot, piggy. --
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Picka ti materina.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists.
sane and decent people dont hate hate devours your soul from inside out and you become what you claim to hate > You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
soc-men dont actually do anything they just sitting around puffing themselves up about what they want to do meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 01:54:24 -0700, mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges <mair_fh @yahoo.com> wrote: >> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists. >sane and decent people dont hate
>hate devours your soul from inside out
>and you become what you claim to hate
That's pretty profound. OK All sane and decent folk and even the worst criminals are disgusted
by rapes while these vermin revel in the idea.
>> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
>soc-men dont actually do anything
>they just sitting around puffing themselves up
>about what they want to do
I am not so sure about that.
>meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
>major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
>impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
"cyclops" <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote in message ...
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:42:47 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> > wrote: >>"cyclops" <cycl@nopspam.org> wrote in message
>>news:f2a843th467sjbv87lo2499t0sgq6n7v02@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>>>>My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO
>>>>very
>>>>touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
>>> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists.
>>> It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find them objects
>>> of admiration and role models.
>>> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
>>Ha Ha Ha! you really do let that one cell brain of yours run wild.
> Think you have worked out all the angles and are too clever to be
> caught eh?
Hey Cycleturd, i bet you talk to yourself as well. :-) -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:08:27 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5 @blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>"cyclops" <cycl@nopspam.org> wrote in message
>news:gfb843p1c3tf1pd8babco79s84l61f9tcq@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:42:47 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>"cyclops" <cycl@nopspam.org> wrote in message
>>>news:f2a843th467sjbv87lo2499t0sgq6n7v02@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 11 May 2007 07:59:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:3v2843pagcnq6s8d9scaqgvcrduqsuhpl5@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On 10 May 2007 21:49:04 -0700, "conno@hotmail.com"
>>>>>> <conno@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On May 11, 2:04 pm, b_brazil@hotmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> X-No-Archive:
>>>>>>>> > Showering women with flowers and diamond necklaces, maybe??
>>>>>>>> Why are you so obsessed with rape?
>>>>>>>Women's sexual power ultimately is the crime of all humanity, as it
>>>>>>>places womens lives FIRST leaving men's lives LAST.... it causes such
>>>>>>>conflict in men's mind that it leads to rape.
>>>>>>>Ending womens sexual power must therefore be a PRIME masculinist
>>>>>>>directive as per Masculinist Smitty's doctrines on mascullinist
>>>>>>>thought and theoretical analysis and interpreting diagramatic dynamic
>>>>>>>structures within the current confines of the masculine sex role in
>>>>>>>the feminist matriarchy cultures of western societies.
>>>>>>>Hope I've made myself perfectly clear?
>>>>>> You have made it perfectly clear that you are in urgent need of a
>>>>>> psychiatrist's attention.
>>>>>> Seek help before it's too late.
>>>>>My! some of the maginas that are infesting soc.men these days are SO
>>>>>very
>>>>>touchy when the word "rape" is mentioned...i wonder why that is?
>>>> It's beyond your ken Piggy, but all sane and decent folk hate rapists.
>>>> It's only k00ks and fuck ups such as yourself, who find them objects
>>>> of admiration and role models.
>>>> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated.
>>>Ha Ha Ha! you really do let that one cell brain of yours run wild.
>> Think you have worked out all the angles and are too clever to be
>> caught eh?
>Hey Cycleturd, i bet you talk to yourself as well. :-)
Do you now? Maybe it's your victims talking to the authorities you should be
concerning yourself about.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges <mair_fh @yahoo.com> Thou fetid bugbane. Thou piss-stained, rug-headed equivocator. Ye entreated: > sane and decent people dont hate
> hate devours your soul from inside out
> and you become what you claim to hate
IAWTP --
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1@registered.motzarella.org
Debil.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On May 11, 6:41 pm, cyclops <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:30:08 GMT, "Avenger" <aven @avengers.co.uk> > You really think the Judge and Jury will buy that?
> You want to work on it a bit more before your inevitable arrest.
Of course not Cyclops, but if you are serious about reducing rape you will demand women put some clothes back on and stop giving men ideas that "all women are... are sex objects to be preyed upon". We actually have guys on this newsgroup who actually want women to
walk around naked. Sheesh. Where's the respect for women in that?
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
In article <2bc843dif5eqdh2sl94civs49ga2im1 @4ax.com>, cyclops <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote: > >> You will find out soon enough when you are caught and incarcerated. > >soc-men dont actually do anything
> >they just sitting around puffing themselves up
> >about what they want to do
> I am not so sure about that.
i could be wrong but they sound like all talk and no action as far as rape is concerned
they sound unequipped for action
meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
On 11 May 2007 02:30:22 -0700, "conno @hotmail.com" <conno @hotmail.com> wrote: >On May 11, 6:41 pm, cyclops <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:30:08 GMT, "Avenger" <aven @avengers.co.uk> >> You really think the Judge and Jury will buy that?
>> You want to work on it a bit more before your inevitable arrest.
>Of course not Cyclops, but if you are serious about reducing rape you
>will demand women put some clothes back on and stop giving men ideas
>that "all women are... are sex objects to be preyed upon".
It might be different in the outback but women do generally wear clothes. >We actually have guys on this newsgroup who actually want women to
>walk around naked.
Actually that's pretty normal for men connor. >Sheesh. Where's the respect for women in that?
The respect comes in how they actually treat women and girls. -----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
In article <t6e843hdoomm5uusomufms9d7uc9mgq @4ax.com>,
cyclops <cycl @nopspam.org> wrote: > On 11 May 2007 02:30:22 -0700, "conno @hotmail.com" > <conno @hotmail.com> wrote: > >On May 11, 6:41 pm, cyclops <cycl@nopspam.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 11 May 2007 08:30:08 GMT, "Avenger" <aven@avengers.co.uk>
> >> You really think the Judge and Jury will buy that?
> >> You want to work on it a bit more before your inevitable arrest.
> >Of course not Cyclops, but if you are serious about reducing rape you
> >will demand women put some clothes back on and stop giving men ideas
> >that "all women are... are sex objects to be preyed upon".
> It might be different in the outback but women do generally wear
> clothes.
> >We actually have guys on this newsgroup who actually want women to
> >walk around naked.
> Actually that's pretty normal for men connor.
what do you say to a naked woman in connors case its -eek-
meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
Brandon D Cartwright wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > <Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: > >"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in embarassment
> >in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
> >> Viking wrote:
> >>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
> >>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
> >>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
> >>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
> >> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> >Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
> >With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
> Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
> On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> wrote:
> >On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
> ><u@example.net> wrote:
> >>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
> >>>rat) wrote:
> >>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
> >>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
> >>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
> >>>>>nonsense.
> >>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
> >>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
> > *laugh* What?
> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> How unsurprising.
> >You're loony tunes.
> Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
> invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
> endemic in soc.men.
> Evasion of question noted.
> >You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
> >tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
> Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
> inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
> Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
> Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
> >Viking, like most of your bettters, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >laughs because your little rat-buddy are so unreasoning
> >and foolish. Plus, your habit of projecting your own
> >insecurities onto others (likely, something you do, Brandon
> >D. Cartwright, as an ego-defense against the truth of
> >what a prick you are) is a further source of amusement
> >to your betters. Free Clue: Any hint of embarassment you
> >think you detect in Viking's laugh, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >comes from Viking's sympathy for the embarassment that YOU
> >are.
> >Out of pity for you (something you don't deserve,
> >Brandon D. Cartwright but magnanamity is a quality
> >your betters have in generous quantity -- you wouldn't
> >understand of course), I'll snip out your stupidest sniveling
> >and move on...
> >>> You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might.
> >>> There is a sexual tension between the genders,
> >>> and that's a matter of power.
> >> Is this incoherent babble [...]
> >Sigh.
> >Give a rape fantasist like you a break, Brandon D. Tartrapist,
> >and you let your imagination get all too florid. Tsk, tsk.
> >"Just look around you," as a rather notorious feminist
> >once advised, Brandon D. Tartrapist, and you'll see
> >plenty of females dressing to attract the attention of men.
> >Their _sexual_ attention. Yeah, I realize that feminists
> >like you
> Since when am I a feminist k00k?
> FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
> > expect men to keep their emotions and sexual
> >responses under tighter control than women do -- this
> >is one of your many feminist double standards, Brandon
> >D. Tartrapist. Face it, when you put on your pretense
> >of being morally superior and indulge your feminist twit
> >self in a bash-fest of men better than you, Brandon D.
> >Tartrapistwannabee, you are being a hypocrite. Again.
> "men" who gloat over the rape and mutilation of other men's
> wives and daughters are nobodies "betters k00k.
> >Your betters have seen so many examples of sad punks
> >like you, Branded D. Tartrapistwannabee, that few of
> >your betters bother trying to inform you of your idiocies
> >and bigotries in hopes of reforming you. Rather, most
> >of your betters just enjoy exploiting you for the fun of
> >making an example of you to others.
> >Some females, when questioned about their "choice"
> >of dressing in the fashion of streetwalkers and Britney
> >Spears wannabees, try out the answer their grandmothers
> >would scoff at: "I'm not dressing for men, I'm dressing
> >for myself and I just want to look pretty." Sheesh.
> >Of course she's "dressing for men"! Where does she
> >suppose the standard of "pretty" comes from? Uh huh,
> >it's the appearance of youthful female sexual fertility.
> >Yes, your betters, Branded A Selfwanker, know that
> >the capacity of females to hypnotize themselves into
> >being blind to the absurdity of the whoppers that so
> >many females swallow is nearly limitless. You, being
> >a mere boy and one who still believes that his mommy
> >is sooo pure, have much of your mommy's indoctrination
> >to discard and a lot of reality to learn about before you
> >can earn respect as a man. If you can.
> Classic meltdown.
> Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
Bullshit, you lying imbecile for genetic reasons. Your movement is over. As you die so dies your mental disease. The children
ain't falling for it, you delusional liar, for genetic reasons.
Suffer. And suffer good you cock sucker.
And you can call it incoherent all you want ...as posterity laughs at you.
-----------------------------------------------Reply-----------------------------------------------
Alexander Von Helmholz wrote: > "Brandon D Cartwright" <u @example.net> wrote in message > news:3a7843tm68au7grsa84b0ekek5jrru8o1j@4ax.com... > > On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:39:53 -0700, "Society" > > <Soci @feminism.is.invalid> wrote: > >>"Brandon D Cartwright" <u@example.net> whined, red-faced in
> >>embarassment
> >>in message news:uad743dquckatj7cq7r87phbmta2h4b0sv@4ax.com...
> >>> Viking wrote:
> >>>>Brandon D Cartwright projected his own behavior...
> >>>>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt
> >>>>>to make reasonable the psychotic ravings of [others].
> >>>> *laugh* What? You're loony tunes.
> >>> An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> >>Emotional cripples like you, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >>characteristically MSread the emotions of others.
> >>With your latest snivel, you show that you fit the profile.
> > Original post restored to defeat k00k snipping and editing
> > On Thu, 10 May 2007 19:39:36 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> > wrote:
> >>On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:21:08 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
> >><u@example.net> wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:07 -0400, Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>>On Thu, 10 May 2007 17:44:37 +0000 (UTC), w@panix.com (the wharf
> >>>>rat) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <lgg643p11bfc2hf84p8r1c7rbenidvr@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>Viking <n@goodgoodbye.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>I'm no rape apologist, and I'm not pro-rape, but that's not utter
> >>>>>>nonsense.
> >>>You are an apologist for rape apologists and attempt to make
> >>>reasonable the psychotic ravings of such as Connor and "avenger".
> >> *laugh* What?
> > An embarrassed laugh is the best you can do ?
> > How unsurprising.
> >>You're loony tunes.
> > Loony tunes is trying to make reasonable the gloating over home
> > invasions, brutal rapes and the tearing out of women's eyes that is
> > endemic in soc.men.
> > Evasion of question noted.
> >>You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might. There is a sexual
> >>tension between the genders, and that's a matter of power.
> > Is this incoherent babble supposed to substitute for your total
> > inability to produce any correlation let alone causation?
> > Blaming the victim for the crime is passe.
> > Rape is caused by rapists..end of story.
> >>Viking, like most of your bettters, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >>laughs because your little rat-buddy are so unreasoning
> >>and foolish. Plus, your habit of projecting your own
> >>insecurities onto others (likely, something you do, Brandon
> >>D. Cartwright, as an ego-defense against the truth of
> >>what a prick you are) is a further source of amusement
> >>to your betters. Free Clue: Any hint of embarassment you
> >>think you detect in Viking's laugh, Brandon D. Cartwright,
> >>comes from Viking's sympathy for the embarassment that YOU
> >>are.
> >>Out of pity for you (something you don't deserve,
> >>Brandon D. Cartwright but magnanamity is a quality
> >>your betters have in generous quantity -- you wouldn't
> >>understand of course), I'll snip out your stupidest sniveling
> >>and move on...
> >>>> You're thinking microcosm, as a feminist might.
> >>>> There is a sexual tension between the genders,
> >>>> and that's a matter of power.
> >>> Is this incoherent babble [...]
> >>Sigh.
> >>Give a rape fantasist like you a break, Brandon D. Tartrapist,
> >>and you let your imagination get all too florid. Tsk, tsk.
> >>"Just look around you," as a rather notorious feminist
> >>once advised, Brandon D. Tartrapist, and you'll see
> >>plenty of females dressing to attract the attention of men.
> >>Their _sexual_ attention. Yeah, I realize that feminists
> >>like you
> > Since when am I a feminist k00k?
> > FYI came across your depraved cesspool soc.men from
> > demented cross posts to sci.electronics.design.
> >> expect men to keep their emotions and sexual
> >>responses under tighter control than women do -- this
> >>is one of your many feminist double standards, Brandon
> >>D. Tartrapist. Face it, when you put on your pretense
> >>of being morally superior and indulge your feminist twit
> >>self in a bash-fest of men better than you, Brandon D.
> >>Tartrapistwannabee, you are being a hypocrite. Again.
> > "men" who gloat over the rape and mutilation of other men's
> > wives and daughters are nobodies "betters k00k.
> >>Your betters have seen so many examples of sad punks
> >>like you, Branded D. Tartrapistwannabee, that few of
> >>your betters bother trying to inform you of your idiocies
> >>and bigotries in hopes of reforming you. Rather, most
> >>of your betters just enjoy exploiting you for the fun of
> >>making an example of you to others.
> >>Some females, when questioned about their "choice"
> >>of dressing in the fashion of streetwalkers and Britney
> >>Spears wannabees, try out the answer their grandmothers
> >>would scoff at: "I'm not dressing for men, I'm dressing
> >>for myself and I just want to look pretty." Sheesh.
> >>Of course she's "dressing for men"! Where does she
> >>suppose the standard of "pretty" comes from? Uh huh,
> >>it's the appearance of youthful female sexual fertility.
> >>Yes, your betters, Branded A Selfwanker, know that
> >>the capacity of females to hypnotize themselves into
> >>being blind to the absurdity of the whoppers that so
> >>many females swallow is nearly limitless. You, being
> >>a mere boy and one who still believes that his mommy
> >>is sooo pure, have much of your mommy's indoctrination
> >>to discard and a lot of reality to learn about before you
> >>can earn respect as a man. If you can.
> > Classic meltdown.
> > Jeez how do they assemble so many perverted freaks in one group?
> God only knows but I wish they would keep their gutwrenching
> sordid filth out of sci.electronics.design.
> To be honest I consider you a troll Brandon, but in comparison you are a
> saint.
> The sheer depravity and horror of these soc.men deviants goes way beyond any
> bounds of human decency.
What nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add to del.icio.us |
Digg this |
Stumble it |
Powered by Megasolutions Inc